Drama,Thriller United States of America
In the movie "Nothing But the Truth," reporter Rachel Armstrong uncovers and releases a classified story that discloses the identity of a covert CIA operative. The story creates a storm of controversy and causes significant damage to national security.
As a result of her bold actions, Rachel is summoned to testify before a grand jury investigating the leak. However, she refuses to reveal her source under any circumstances, invoking her right to protect her source's identity and maintain the freedom of the press.
Special prosecutor, Patton Dubois, determines that Rachel's actions have impeded national security and publicly questions her integrity as a journalist. Rachel is then charged with contempt of court and is subsequently taken into custody.
During her incarceration, Rachel's husband, Ray Armstrong, is left to care for their young son alone. The strain on their relationship becomes increasingly evident as Ray struggles to comprehend Rachel's unwavering dedication to her principles.
Rachel's attorney, Albert Burnside, recognizes the significance of the case and takes it upon himself to fight for her cause. Burnside believes that journalists must uphold the principles of truth and freedom of speech, even at the cost of their personal freedom.
As the legal battle intensifies, Burnside argues Rachel's case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In their argument, they emphasize the crucial role a free press plays in a democratic society, asserting that coercing journalists to disclose their sources would have a chilling effect on future whistleblowers and investigative reporting.
The court is divided, as some justices prioritize national security over journalistic freedom, while others recognize the importance of protecting whistleblowers and maintaining the public's right to know.
Ultimately, the decision is reached, and the Supreme Court rules against Rachel, concluding that the government's interest in preserving national security outweighs her right to protect her source.
Rachel is devastated by the outcome but remains resolute in her beliefs. Her refusal to compromise her principles leaves a lasting impact on the role of journalism and the delicate balance between national security and press freedom.
As a result of her bold actions, Rachel is summoned to testify before a grand jury investigating the leak. However, she refuses to reveal her source under any circumstances, invoking her right to protect her source's identity and maintain the freedom of the press.
Special prosecutor, Patton Dubois, determines that Rachel's actions have impeded national security and publicly questions her integrity as a journalist. Rachel is then charged with contempt of court and is subsequently taken into custody.
During her incarceration, Rachel's husband, Ray Armstrong, is left to care for their young son alone. The strain on their relationship becomes increasingly evident as Ray struggles to comprehend Rachel's unwavering dedication to her principles.
Rachel's attorney, Albert Burnside, recognizes the significance of the case and takes it upon himself to fight for her cause. Burnside believes that journalists must uphold the principles of truth and freedom of speech, even at the cost of their personal freedom.
As the legal battle intensifies, Burnside argues Rachel's case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In their argument, they emphasize the crucial role a free press plays in a democratic society, asserting that coercing journalists to disclose their sources would have a chilling effect on future whistleblowers and investigative reporting.
The court is divided, as some justices prioritize national security over journalistic freedom, while others recognize the importance of protecting whistleblowers and maintaining the public's right to know.
Ultimately, the decision is reached, and the Supreme Court rules against Rachel, concluding that the government's interest in preserving national security outweighs her right to protect her source.
Rachel is devastated by the outcome but remains resolute in her beliefs. Her refusal to compromise her principles leaves a lasting impact on the role of journalism and the delicate balance between national security and press freedom.
You My Also Like
©AgoMovie(agomovie.com)